Posted April 27th, 2009 by CG
So where is the strangest place you and your partner have ever had sex? An airplane, the economy class section of a commuter train or other public transport?
How about on a well travelled trail through a forest (shortcut), on a pool table, office desk, or in a public toilet? I bet you never had sex in a dumpster.
Get a load of this horny couple, who by the way to the best of my knowledge aren’t homeless. They did it in a dumpster.
A police officer in Saanich, British Columbia answered a call of suspicious persons hanging around a local parking lot, and when he arrived on the scene to investigate, he discovered a 30-year-old woman and a 26-year-old man fornicating in a garbage dumpster.
Talk about getting down and dirty. If the man engaged in a little oral sex, you can bet he got a little more than a mouthful.
Yuck.
Here’s a sick news story about a two people who I think mutually agreed to ‘get their rocks off’ together via use of the webcam, only in this instance, the woman committed several criminal acts for somebody who encouraged her to commit the acts.
The man in this story should be facing criminal charges too, not that he won’t be in the very near future. There’s something about ‘his story’ that just doesn’t sit right with me.
A very horny and sick woman from Lakeshore, Ontario has been arrested and charge for sexually assaulting her young child and a dog and broadcasting the acts over the Internet via a webcam. Obviously the woman has some issues, the kind of issues that should see locked up in a padded room, but what about the person who called the Ontario Provincial Police.
According to news reports, he watched the woman’s acts on his computer, but waited until the next day to report the incident to police. What’s that say about him? He should have called the police immediately, but he didn’t and that begs the question, why?
There is obviously something effed in the head about him too, and if I was a cop, I would be going out of my way to find out this guy’s ‘story.’ There’s a reason why the guy watched the webcast and waited until the next day to report it, and I would want to know why.
I bet the only reason he called the cops is because the woman wouldn’t put out for him, that after ‘getting off’ himself, he threatened to expose the woman if she didn’t ‘put out’ for him.
That’s right, I think he attempted to blackmail her into having sex with him, but she refused, and he followed through with his threat.
Anyway, the woman has been charged with bestiality, sexual assault, sexual interference and sexual exploitation, and according to police, she could face additional charges. Those charges relate to making, possession, and distribution of child pornography. Police are currently examining her computer, and no doubt the computer that belongs to the man who called in the complaint.
As for that man, it sounds to me like he was the woman’s enabler, and in fact may have conspired with the woman to have her commit the acts he obviously ‘got off’ on watching.
The woman invited him to view her webcam and he accepted. He could have turned it off and called the police immediately, but instead he chose to watch the webcast in its entirety, and then called police the next day.
There is something not right about that, and my gut is telling me that while he may not have participated in the act, he may have been ’spanking his monkey‘ while watching the criminal act.
I have to wonder if she wasn’t doing it for his enjoyment as much as hers, and whether or not he goaded her into committing the acts she is charged with.
The child had been placed into the custody of the Children’s Aid Society.
The woman was scheduled to appear in court Monday (yesterday from where I’m sitting).
Caroline Cartwright is a woman who makes a lot of noise in bed, and no, I’m not talking about her snoring, or farting.
I’ve met a few women in my day who were noisy too, but never in a million years did I think my neighbours would complain about the moaning, groaning and loud whimpering I brought them too.
Really, does anybody think of their neighbours when we’re doing it like the animals are doing it on the Discovery Channel? I know I don’t, and these days the louder my wife is, the better I feel about myself. I just know I’m doing it right when her screams of joy can be heard on the street.
Then again she could be faking it.
By the way, I live in a duplex, and our bedroom is on the other side of our neighbour’s bedroom. I can hear their TV sometimes, that’s how thin the walls are. Imagine what they must hear sometimes.
Anyway, Ms. Cartwright, 47, was fined a little more than a $CA1000.00 for breaching a noise by-law in England during what her ‘marathon’ sex romps with her husband Steven.
She was also spanked with an Antisocial Behaviour Disorder after judges were forced to sit through tapes of her loud lovemaking sessions. I can’t believe Ms. Cartwright’s neighbour recorded her lovemaking sessions. Obviously, the neighbour who is partially deaf by the way, has too much time on her hands. But where those hands were while she was lying in bed listening to Ms. Cartwright’s moans, groans and screams of pleasure…well, I leave that to your imagination.
According to the neighbour, Rachel O’Connor, she has put up with the noise since she moved into her flat in November of 2007. From midnight to 3am, and then from 6am until 9am, the noise was unbearable.
Aah, the wonders of Viagra huh Mr. and Mrs. Cartwright?
Anyway, Ms. O’Connor eventually had enough and she contacted police, who then put her in touch with Environmental Health officer Pamela Spark.
Ms. Spark told the court that she heard 23 recordings of the couple having sex, and that there was excessive screaming from Ms. Cartwright.
One other neighbour, also partially deaf, told the court she had not had a decent night’s sleep in two years because of the Cartwrights.
Ridiculous but true.
Then there’s the story about the Florida man who was busted for having what authorities are claiming was a threesome with a pair of blow-up dolls in a supermarket parking lot.
Obviously 51-year-old George Bartusek isn’t too shy about what he has does in public, which isn’t always a bad thing by the way, but boinking a couple of blow-up dolls in broad daylight, come on now. There is definitely something wrong with that guy.
Hmm, thinking Viagra might have had something to do with his parking lot porn performance.
Witnesses at the scene, some of whom you just know couldn’t take their eyes of the man and his two dolls, said he was fondling the two ’synthetic sex kittens,’ kissing them and bouncing them up and down while trying to get the attention of Publix shoppers.
Aah yes, nothing like a middle-age showman on Viagra showing Cape Coral shoppers how he likes to get his rocks off.
Another witness says her daughter couldn’t believe what she was seeing. I wonder how long she watched the ‘plastic porker‘ before she turned away by the way. I bet everybody who witnessed the man’s act stood there and watched for several minutes, or until the police showed up anyway.
Bartusek has since answered to the charges he was facing, breach of peace and trespassing, and was sentenced to 6 months probation. He was facing a year in jail.
Did I hear Courtney Love call Pamela Anderson trailer trash?
Have you ever wondered what Canadians think of Pamela Anderson, if she is held in high regard, if Canadians adore her? Seriously, have you?
Crooked in Canada can answer that question for you right here, right now. No, she isn’t held in high regard, and they absolutely effin’ not adore her.
You see, the problem with Pamela Anderson is that a hell of a lot of Canadians thinks she’s a whore, a skank. Really they do.
Why do you think she moved to the U.S. in the first place, because she’s a talented personality that could make it bigger in the U.S. than she could in Canada? Ha, ha, ha…Don’t make me laugh.
The only reason Anderson moved to the U.S. is because American audiences turn the other cheek to the kind of sluttish behaviour she puts on display there, and other parts of the world.
Canadians might reluctantly tolerate her slutty and sleazy act, but when it comes to moneymaking opportunities for her in the Great White North, that act severely limits her ability to earn an income in Canada. Nobody wants her, and it would appear that her act is wearing thin in the U.S. now too.
Pamela Anderson is the sluttiest and filthiest Canadian celebrity to ever grace the pages of Playboy and television screens (she didn’t get that Hep being Ms. Clean that’s for sure), and it is a rare occasion where anybody living in Canada has something good about her to say. She does have her parents in ‘her corner,’ but they aren’t there because of what she has become or made of herself, which these days I hear is something akin to ‘trailer trash.’
Yeah that’s right, she’s trailer trash through and through these days, darn near penniless too, according to another sleazy and slutty celebrity anyway.
Train wreck Courtney Love has been claiming that Anderson doesn’t even have a credit card these days and is living in a doublewide trailer in a trailer park. Love fell just short of saying that Anderson doesn’t have a pot to piss in.
I’m not surprised the former ‘Bud Girl‘ is down and out in Malibu, what with her gambling addiction, and the fact that she has always lived beyond her means.
I often found myself wondering how Anderson could afford to be a jetsetter, partyer and gambler on her income. Never did I think she was making enough money to afford the lifestyle she was making for herself while she dumped her children off on either her ex-husband or parents who still live in British Columbia.
So anyway, Pamela Anderson is either one foot in, or one foot out of skid row depending on how you want to look at it, and to me that’s karma. She deserves to be where she is as far as I’m concerned. Her career is history. Now she can really focus on being a gold-digger.
By the way, I hear she got her hooks into a new man. His name is Jamie Padgett, an electrician and scuba diver who lives in the same Malibu trailer park she does. Lol, I really doubt he has the kind of money she needs to continue living beyond her means, but you never know I guess.
Padgett doesn’t strike me as the type of guy that would put up with Anderson kind of BS, so it is highly unlikely her relationship with is going to amount to much more than any of her previous relationships. The guy isn’t cashed up, at the end of the day, it’s all about the ‘Benjamins’ for Pammy. If ‘loverboy ‘doesn’t have them she will dump him for somebody with deeper pockets sooner or later.
Maybe it’s just me, but when it comes to Perez and gay rights, he tends to hide in the shadows. I’m not saying he doesn’t promote gay rights, I’m just saying that he doesn’t do it often, not unless there is something in it for him. That’s why I am questioning his sincerity now.
Don’t you think that if Perez meant what he has been saying the past couple of days about Prejean’s values and opinion of gay marriage, which by the way she is entitled to own just as much as Perez has the right to perform anal sex and call his partner’s bitches, that he would have been a lot more vocal about his views on gay marriage in the past.
Let’s face it, Perez really hasn’t done much to advance the gay rights cause , and he certainly doesn’t go out of his way to speak publicly about it, choosing instead to remain in the shadows blowing the paparazzi for nothing more than publicity to advance the ‘gay rights’ cause.
What Perez Hilton should be doing instead of the talk show circuit is getting down on his hands and knees, and apologizing to Miss California for calling her a dumb bitch. I mean come on now; think about it, her response to his question was straight, to the point, and certainly appropriate. How does that make her dumb?
As far as I’m concerned, the only dumb bitch in this story is Perez Hilton, dumb because he created this controversy out of the spite he has for Miss California, because she didn‘t give him the answer he wanted to from her.
He wanted her to say she’s all for it, but she didn’t deliver and he got pissed.
Make no mistake about it; Perez was motivated to create this controversy to promote himself because he personally was offended that somebody had an opposing view to his. Miss California gave a truthful answer, not that Perez would not what truthfulness is, and he couldn’t handle it.
That’s what this is all about really, Perez not being able to illicit the answer he wanted. This controversy really has nothing to do with Ms. Prejean’s response, and a whole lot to do with his being offended, which by the way is kind of ironic given that he goes out of his way to offend others himself.
